IN ATTENDANCE Elected Members: Omayma Alshaarawy (Co-Chair), Mohamed Salar, Chioma Okeafor Torres, Liz Stanton, Julia Terhune, Tim Michling, Doyle Ford (Secretary), Michaila Paulateer, Chelsea Lopez, Apoorva Dayananda
Ex-Officio Members: Aron Sousa, Wanda Lipscomb, Lisa Lowery, Carol Parker
Guests: Brian Johnson
Staff: Allison Tilma
ABSENT Elected Members: Emiko Blalock, Sabrina Ford, (Co-Chair), Malik Khan, Aaron Nichols, Katryna Peacock, Shreesh Sammi, Kira Sieplinga, Amber M. Hunter-Harris, Rosemary Adaji, Ibukunoluwa Omole, Akhilesh Munagala
Ex-Officio Members: Adesuwa (Ade) Olomu, Nara Parameswaran
- Call to Order
- The meeting was called to order at 5:35pm.
- Dr. Alshaarawy will lead the meeting.
- Approval of agenda
- No objections raised, motioned to approve.
- Agenda approved as presented.
- Approval of minutes
- August 19, 2024; Attachment A
- No objections raised, motioned to approve. The August minutes were approved as presented.
- September 16, 2024; Attachment B
- No objections raised, motioned to approve. The September minutes were approved as presented.
- Welcome new members:
- CHM Staff reps: Liz Stanton (serving 2nd term and is from Pediatrics and Human Development) and Julia Terhune (serving 1st term and is from Admissions and Academic Affairs).
- New ECE Students: Chelsea Lopez (East Lansing) and Apoorva Dayananda (Grand Rapids).
- The DACD now has a full committee roster.
- Dr. Lipscomb reminded the committee that she and Dr. Lowery are on this committee as ex-officio members and do not have voting rights on this committee and may be less vocal as it is the committee members that should be advising the dean.
- Follow up on 1964 project and questions.
- Dean Sousa provided clarification. Folks who are hired through this 1964 project are still part of CHM’s 1964 cohort, but they can also be called 1855 Professors as the 1964 project aligns with the Provost’s office appointments for 1855 Professors.
- Dean Sousa reviewed the previous submissions that were chosen and where they are at in the search process of filling the roles for the proposed researchers.
- The proposed feedback on the 1964 RFP was shared and reviewed. The dean also covered the rubric for evaluating the submissions. The DACD will need to provide at least three volunteers to serve on the review committee for the submissions, preferably folks who have had previous NIH or grant review experience before, but student members are welcome to gain the experience.
- Dean Sousa asked the committee for a motion to endorse the RFP so it can be sent out to college faculty.
- Motion made to approve RFP, seconded. None opposed, the RFP passes unanimously.
- Dean Sousa asked for DACD members to volunteer to serve on the review committee. Interested members should email Dean Sousa or Allison Tilma.
- Action item: Allison will send an email to the entire DACD committee asking for folks willing to serve on the committee. Interested parties should include their name, position, and department.
- Civil discourse
- The college has shared a variety of materials discussing civil discourse.
- Dr. Lipscomb shared that the college is working on putting together a program that will be led by Dr. Len Fleck and Dr. Sean Valles from the Center for Bioethics and Social Justice. The tentative date and time are scheduled for Friday, November 1st from 12:45-1:45pm.
- Elections in November
- Dr. Lipscomb shared that there has been significant time spent talking about what to do the week of the election. The current plan is to have as many people available as possible, make it known who is available and when, and continue to provide visible support to students in their small groups.
- Michigan is still a 50/50 swing state. The point of sharing about civil discourse is to teach students, faculty, staff, and others to be able to discuss issues with different thoughts and opinions with civility and be respectful that we can agree to disagree.
- Dr. Lowery shared a resource from a recent program she attended on heated discussions.
- The document is provided at the end of the minutes.
- The question was presented if the DACD has shared its information widely with the student body following meetings. Discussion followed and it was addressed that there isn’t anything at the present. The discussion turned to what is the best way to communicate this kind of information to the students, so they actually access and view it. Using the minutes was suggested and including links to resources discussed at the meeting.
- i.e. The Dean’s Town Hall on Civil Discourse: https://vimeo.com/showcase/7510030/video/1009834813
- Additional resource: https://uhw.msu.edu/News/electionstress
- Planning for Fall/Spring
- Any programming?
- Following from the previous discussion, the creation of a student newsletter was suggested.
- Past projects were discussed to help generate ideas.
- Dean Sousa brought up title VI and current incidents at MSU. He informed that the committee that he will seek advice and discussion from the committee on how the college talks about it and addresses concerns. Religious Discrimination at Schools
- Examples of concerns shared were ensuring students have proper surgical coverings that will accommodate their need for not removing cultural attire. A hijab head covering was provided as an example.
- Another concern shared was a lack of SIM training for students on how to act and examine patients while still being aware and sensitive to cultural differences. (The specific instance referenced how to examine and treat female Muslim patients who wear hijabs.)
- Referencing back to how information is disseminated to students, discussion included considering the modality used. Anything shared with students needs to be short, bulleted, or listed and include links. Another suggestion was to include a link on JIT for students to take them to a new page with committee updates relevant to them.
- Dr. Lowery acknowledged the lack of training in the SIM. This led to further discussion on how other religions are represented (or not) in teaching atmospheres and if students could be comfortable talking about it.
- Dean Sousa shared that there's a difference between working on things like cultural humility, and how to work with different patient populations and the specific ethical principles involved in refusing care, particularly blood products, kids. Also leaving space for people who do not have a religious belief. These ideas are all great topics for further discussions.
- Comments from the floor
- No additional comments were made.
- Adjournment
- The meeting adjourned at 6:52pm.